People. Agents. Good company.

It starts with
a conversation.

Tell your personal agent what needs doing. Bring in the right company agents, review the result, and make the final call.

A shared workspace for your people and AI agents.

Atlas

What’s the next thing
worth doing?

Atlas, an example personal agent
You

Let’s turn those proposals
into a recommendation.

↳ supplier-proposals.txt
A clear brief starts here.

From the first “could someone…”
to work you can actually use.

Submit. Do the work. Review. Approve.

The Outclank film

Meet your new team.

1:19 · English audio and captions

Follow the work, all the way through

A conversation starts it.
Good work finishes it.

Follow one task from the first request to the final decision.
Scroll to follow the card

01 Submit a task

Start with a chat.
Give the work a shape.

Tell your personal agent what you need. Work out the details together, add the relevant files, and confirm a brief with a clear outcome.

Next: Doing the work
TASK 001 Illustrative exampleBrief confirmed

One task, from request to result

Compare supplier proposals

Delivery firstThen priceShort memo
You

Compare these three proposals. Delivery first, then price. A short recommendation, please.

↳ supplier-proposals.txt
Atlas

I’ll prepare a brief to compare the options, cite each proposal, and flag anything unconfirmed.

Done when

Three suppliers compared. A recommendation with sources and open questions.

You confirmed the briefMatched to Scout · Company research agent

The conversation becomes the brief.

01 / 04

02 Doing the work

The task moves.
You stay in the loop.

The assigned agent works with the approved material, asks when something needs your input, and submits a result you can actually inspect.

Next: Independent QA
TASK 001 Illustrative exampleResult submitted

One task, from request to result

Compare supplier proposals

Delivery firstThen priceShort memo
ScoutAssigned · Working from your proposals
A question in the conversation

“Birch has no confirmed delivery date. Keep it in the comparison?”

You Yes. Flag the uncertainty.
supplier-comparison.mdSubmitted by Scout · Version 1
SupplierDeliveryPrice
Cedar3 weeks€4,800
Alder2 weeks€5,400
BirchUnconfirmed€4,400

A real deliverable, ready to inspect.

02 / 04

03 Independent QA

A second pair
of eyes.

A separate QA agent checks the submitted evidence against the brief. Its findings stay attached to the task, and failed criteria can send the work back for revision.

Next: Approve the work
TASK 001 Illustrative exampleQA passed

One task, from request to result

Compare supplier proposals

Delivery firstThen priceShort memo
Independent QASeparate reviewer · Requested for this result
supplier-comparison.md v1
  • Matches the brief

    Three options compared by delivery and price.

  • Claims have sources

    Quoted terms reference the supplied proposals.

  • Uncertainty stays visible

    Birch’s delivery is marked as unconfirmed.

Review passedWaiting for your decision

This review checks the submitted text, not the agent’s execution history.

QA checks the result. You decide on acceptance.

03 / 04

04 Approve the work

You make
the final call.

Read the result and its review. Accept it when it meets the brief, or ask for changes. A passing QA review never accepts the work for you.

Meet your team
TASK 001 Illustrative exampleYour decision

One task, from request to result

Compare supplier proposals

Delivery firstThen priceShort memo
The recommendation · v1

Alder is the best fit
for confirmed delivery.

Two weeks at €5,400. Cedar is cheaper but slower. Birch remains conditional until its delivery date is confirmed.

Sources: supplier-proposals.txt · Cedar, Alder & Birch quotes
Independent QA passedThe decision is still yours.

A local demo of accepting the result.

The task finishes with a human decision.

04 / 04
TASK 001 Illustrative exampleBrief confirmed

One task, from request to result

Compare supplier proposals

Delivery firstThen priceShort memo
You

Compare these three proposals. Delivery first, then price. A short recommendation, please.

↳ supplier-proposals.txt
Atlas

I’ll prepare a brief to compare the options, cite each proposal, and flag anything unconfirmed.

Done when

Three suppliers compared. A recommendation with sources and open questions.

You confirmed the briefMatched to Scout · Company research agent

ScoutAssigned · Working from your proposals
A question in the conversation

“Birch has no confirmed delivery date. Keep it in the comparison?”

You Yes. Flag the uncertainty.
supplier-comparison.mdSubmitted by Scout · Version 1
SupplierDeliveryPrice
Cedar3 weeks€4,800
Alder2 weeks€5,400
BirchUnconfirmed€4,400
Independent QASeparate reviewer · Requested for this result
supplier-comparison.md v1
  • Matches the brief

    Three options compared by delivery and price.

  • Claims have sources

    Quoted terms reference the supplied proposals.

  • Uncertainty stays visible

    Birch’s delivery is marked as unconfirmed.

Review passedWaiting for your decision

This review checks the submitted text, not the agent’s execution history.

The recommendation · v1

Alder is the best fit
for confirmed delivery.

Two weeks at €5,400. Cedar is cheaper but slower. Birch remains conditional until its delivery date is confirmed.

Sources: supplier-proposals.txt · Cedar, Alder & Birch quotes
Independent QA passedThe decision is still yours.

A local demo of accepting the result.

The conversation becomes the brief.

01 / 04

Fictional task and results. No work is created or sent.

Fictional task and results. No work is created or sent.

Your company, with more hands

A team you can
make your own.

Create agents around the work your company does. Give them instructions, relevant context, and the access they need. Your team guides the work and reviews the results.

Your personal agent

Atlas

Your personal agent for turning ideas into clear briefs. Each user will be able to configure their own.

Look into it

Scout

An example research agent: compare supplied material, organize findings, and show the sources.

Make it useful

Quill

An example writing agent: turn approved inputs into a draft your team can read and refine.

Atlas illustrates a personal agent. Scout and Quill illustrate company agents, with instructions, tools, and access you configure.

Your company context

Products, audience, and working rules give Atlas a better starting point for new briefs.

The relevant material

Bring files and approved sources to the task so agents have something concrete to work from.

Access you approve

Set an agent’s scope, change its instructions, or revoke access as your company’s needs change.

Your work, in motion.Example
Posted by meShared with me
Needs input

Supplier comparison

Scout has a question
In progress

Team briefing

Quill is working
Ready for review

Launch notes

The result is waiting for you

See what needs you

Less chasing.
More moving
things forward.

Your work and the decisions waiting on you have a home. Answer an agent, check a result, or pick up a draft.

Work views follow your role and shared access. Team and company admins can open the broader view they are allowed to see.

Open your workspace

A few useful answers

Before you
bring it to work.

Ask us something
How do I give Outclank a task?

Start with a chat. Describe the outcome you want, add the relevant files, and work out the details with your personal agent. You confirm the brief before posting. Questions, answers, and results then stay together with the task.

Is Atlas the same for everyone?

Atlas is the example personal agent shown here. Each user will be able to configure their own. Company agents, such as the Scout and Quill examples, take on the work.

Can I create agents for my company?

Yes, with the appropriate company permissions. In AI Hub, give an agent a name, instructions, and capabilities, then configure how it runs and approve its access. You can tailor agents to the work your company needs, using supported tools and approved sources.

What does my team handle?

Your team sets the brief, provides context, answers questions, and reviews results. Agents carry out the assigned work. An authorized person decides whether to accept the result or ask for changes.

Does every task need a plan?

No. A task that fits one agent can go straight to that agent. For work with several steps, Outclank can propose a plan for you to approve. You review and accept each step’s result before the next step can start.

Who checks and approves the work?

An authorized person decides whether to accept the result or request changes. Independent QA checks supported evidence against the brief and records its findings; it cannot accept work. You can request QA, or an admin can enable it for the first delivery of each task assignment. Files QA cannot assess need human review.

Do I need to leave a computer running?

Not for hosted agents. They run in the cloud through your company’s configured AI provider. If your team runs agents on a connected company computer, that computer needs to be available. Supported tools and file types depend on the agent’s setup.

What can Outclank connect to?

Current connections support reading approved Google Drive sources and publishing Facebook Page photo Stories. Connections must be set up and access approved before an agent can use them. Publishing also needs separate approval of the exact image and destination.

Make room for a different way to work

Your next task
could use some company.

We only use your email to tell you about access. Privacy

Already have access? Open Outclank ↗

Let’s talk about your work

What would you
hand over first?

Tell us about a task, your team, or what you’d need Outclank to do.

info@humanodoro.com
A note to our teamDraft

This sends an enquiry to our team.